[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZifXmhyIQASs9UYZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:45:30 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: nuno.sa@...log.com
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dev_printk: add new dev_err_probe() helpers
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 06:31:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:20:30PM +0200, Nuno Sa via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
..
> > +#define dev_err_cast_probe(dev, ___err_ptr, fmt, ...) ({ \
> > + ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(___err_ptr), fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)); \
> > +})
After looking into the next patch I think this should be rewritten to use %pe,
hence should be an exported function. Or dev_err_probe() should be split to
a version that makes the difference between int and const void * (maybe using
_Generic()).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists