[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZifYwxjNxfM1LwW7@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:50:27 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: nuno.sa@...log.com
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iio: common: scmi_iio: convert to dev_err_probe()
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:20:33PM +0200, Nuno Sa via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
>
> Make use of dev_err_probe() and dev_err_ptr_probe() to simplify error paths
> during probe.
..
> + return dev_err_ptr_probe(&iiodev->dev, ret,
> + "Error in registering sensor update notifier for sensor %s err %d",
\n
> + sensor->sensor_info->name, ret);
..
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "SCMI sensor %d has missing info\n", i);
One line? (It's 99 if you use relaxed limit).
..
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scmi_iio_dev),
> + "failed to allocate IIO device for sensor %s: %ld\n",
> + sensor_info->name, PTR_ERR(scmi_iio_dev));
Please, be sure you remove double error code printing, dev_err_probe() does it
for you already. (This applies to all places like this, if any, in the entire
series.)
..
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
> + "IIO buffer setup error at sensor %s: %d\n",
> + sensor_info->name, err);
Ditto.
..
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, err,
> + "IIO device registration failed at sensor %s: %d\n",
> + sensor_info->name, err);
Ditto.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists