[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a17206389b075a30fc0b8536f982aae80ee62da5.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 13:33:38 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, nuno.sa@...log.com
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, John
Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Olivier Moysan
<olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Jyoti
Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iio: common: scmi_iio: convert to dev_err_probe()
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 18:50 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:20:33PM +0200, Nuno Sa via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> >
> > Make use of dev_err_probe() and dev_err_ptr_probe() to simplify error paths
> > during probe.
>
> ...
>
> > + return dev_err_ptr_probe(&iiodev->dev, ret,
> > + "Error in registering sensor update
> > notifier for sensor %s err %d",
>
> \n
sure...
>
> > + sensor->sensor_info->name, ret);
>
> ...
>
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> > + "SCMI sensor %d has missing
> > info\n", i);
>
> One line? (It's 99 if you use relaxed limit).
Being this IIO, Jonathan prefers to stick the old limit unless readability is hurt...
>
> ...
>
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(scmi_iio_dev),
> > + "failed to allocate IIO device for
> > sensor %s: %ld\n",
> > + sensor_info->name,
> > PTR_ERR(scmi_iio_dev));
>
> Please, be sure you remove double error code printing, dev_err_probe() does it
> for you already. (This applies to all places like this, if any, in the entire
> series.)
Up... blind conversion. Thanks!
- Nuno Sá
Powered by blists - more mailing lists