linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024042328-footprint-enrage-2db3@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:23:46 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@...gloub.eu>
Cc: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:20:05PM -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> 
> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
> 
> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>  commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
> so they should get the fix ASAP too.

The fix needs to show up in Linus's tree, is it on its way there?

thanks,

greg k-h