linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a9b7f1fc-7b07-41e4-8957-876d428399be@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:06:16 +0300
From: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@...gloub.eu>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "Ruinskiy, Dima"
	<dima.ruinskiy@...el.com>, "Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@...el.com>,
	"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

On 23/04/2024 19:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:20:05PM -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
>> Hi Sasha,
>>
>>
>> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
>>
>> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
>> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>>   commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
>> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
> 
> The fix needs to show up in Linus's tree, is it on its way there?

yes. Routed via intel-wired-lan: 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h