linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add Mobileye EyeQ5 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:23:16 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add Mobileye EyeQ5
 support

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:08:05PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue Apr 23, 2024 at 12:25 PM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 23/04/2024 12:04, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > On Tue Apr 23, 2024 at 7:00 AM CEST, Mark Brown wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 06:52:47PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > >>> All commits tagged "(no commit info)" do not show up in your for-next
> > >>> branch. Is that expected and is there anything I can do? There was one
> > >>> pending -Wunused-variable compiler warning to be addressed for
> > >>> example, see [0].
> > >>
> > >> Please submit any patches you'd like to see included.  If there were
> > >> outstanding issues that need fixing then fixing those prior to
> > >> submitting would be sensible.
> > > 
> > > Seeing "Applied" followed by a list of commits, with some of those not
> > > being applied confused me.
> >
> > That's a standard output of b4 and maybe also Patchwork, if some parts
> > are applied.
> 
> Thanks for the pointer. I've created an issue over at b4 to see what
> people think about this matter. Current behavior is not intuitive as a
> young contributor.

FWIW, given I see `having a more confident comment such as
"(commit not applied)".` there, having (no commit info) doesn't mean
that it wasn't applied always. Sometimes I've found that due to changes
in the patch b4 could not detect that it was applied and reported (no
commit info).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)