linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add Mobileye EyeQ5 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZihaBGwVRpI9hV0B@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:01:56 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
	Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/9] spi: cadence-qspi: add Mobileye EyeQ5
 support

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 06:23:16PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:08:05PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:

> > Thanks for the pointer. I've created an issue over at b4 to see what
> > people think about this matter. Current behavior is not intuitive as a
> > young contributor.

> FWIW, given I see `having a more confident comment such as
> "(commit not applied)".` there, having (no commit info) doesn't mean
> that it wasn't applied always. Sometimes I've found that due to changes
> in the patch b4 could not detect that it was applied and reported (no
> commit info).

Right, it can't prove a negative - if it can't find the patch it could
be because it wasn't sent against current code and got changed
sufficiently in application to cause issues.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)