lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 13:24:52 +0530
From: Mohammad Shehar Yaar Tausif <sheharyaar48@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: usb: uhci: convert to dt schema

On 4/23/24 12:24 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/04/2024 14:21, Mohammad Shehar Yaar Tausif wrote:
>> Convert USB UHCI bindings to DT schema. Documenting aspeed compatibles
>> and missing properties. Adding aspeed/generic-uhci example and fix previous
>> incorrect example.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Shehar Yaar Tausif <sheharyaar48@...il.com>
> 
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - interrupts
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            const: generic-uhci
>> +    then:
>> +      $ref: usb-hcd.yaml
> 
> Nothing improved here.

Sorry, I could not understand this, please guide me about the correction 
required here.
I added $ref inside the if-then block because it was raising errors when 
tested against
dts files that used "platform-uhci" as the compatible. Putting it above 
the if block did
not work.

When I ref the usb-hcd.yaml, it also includes usb.yaml which requires 
the nodename to start with usb*,
but the dtsi that use the deprecated compatible 
(arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500/wm8505.dtsi) have their nodename with
uhci*, which causes the tests to fail.

>> +      required:
>> +        - clocks
> 
> And this was not tested.
>> +
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    uhci@...07b00 {
>> +        compatible = "platform-uhci";
> 
> What happened here? This is deprecated!

The original example has the nodename as uhci* which causes the schema 
to fail as mentioned earlier.
Should I just remove the example or should I rename the node here and 
add clock field to the original example ?

Best Regards,
Shehar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ