linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0cfc4e2d-65ab-0040-2c7d-fad83f32455b@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:53:34 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, <x86@...nel.org>, Russell King
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Miguel
 Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Salil Mehta
	<salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave
 Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	<justin.he@....com>, <jianyong.wu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of
 acpi_processor earlier

> @@ -232,6 +263,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>   	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>   	static int cpu0_initialized;
>   	unsigned long long value;
> +	int ret;
>   
>   	acpi_processor_errata();
>   
> @@ -316,10 +348,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>   	 *  because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now.
>   	 */
>   	if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
> -		int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
> +		ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device);
>   
>   		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +			goto err;
> +	} else {
> +		acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device);
>   	}
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -357,6 +391,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>   		arch_fix_phys_package_id(pr->id, value);
>   
>   	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;

..

> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -365,8 +403,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>    * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc.
>    * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe().
>    */
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array);
> -
>   static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>   					const struct acpi_device_id *id)
>   {
> @@ -395,28 +431,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>   	if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Buggy BIOS check.
> -	 * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS.
> -	 * Don't trust it blindly
> -	 */
> -	if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL &&
> -	    per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) {
> -		dev_warn(&device->dev,
> -			"BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n",
> -			pr->id);
> -		/* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> -	/*
> -	 * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS
> -	 * checks.
> -	 */
> -	per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device;
> -	per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr;

Nit: seems we need to remove the duplicated
per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; in acpi_processor_add():

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -446,7 +446,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device 
*device,
   err:
         free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map);
         device->driver_data = NULL;
-       per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL;
   err_free_pr:
         kfree(pr);
         return result;

Thanks
Hanjun