[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240424185455.p35dp3sqnlugxenv@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 20:54:55 +0200
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: lan966x: flower: validate control
flags
The 04/24/2024 12:53, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
>
> This series adds flower control flags validation to the
> lan966x driver, and changes it from assuming that it handles
> all control flags, to instead reject rules if they have
> masked any unknown/unsupported control flags.
For the entire series:
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
>
> ---
> Changelog:
>
> v2:
> * Split first patch into 2 (requested by Jiri)
> * Added cover letter (requested by Simon)
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240423102720.228728-1-ast@fiberby.net/
>
> Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen (3):
> net: lan966x: flower: add extack to
> lan966x_tc_flower_handler_control_usage()
> net: lan966x: flower: rename goto in
> lan966x_tc_flower_handler_control_usage()
> net: lan966x: flower: check for unsupported control flags
>
> .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_tc_flower.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists