[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083E2D7B7108FA491C46157FC102@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:57:55 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 00/71] New Intel CPUID families
>> But the tl;dr version is that some surgery is required to make adding
>> CPUs with new CPUID "family" values elegant.
>
> Hey Tony,
>
> With the exception of the unavoidable PECI goofiness, this seems like a
> really universal win in readability and compactness. It's looks really
> nice. Thanks!
Thanks Dave. Feel free to dig into any of the arch/x86 patches that don't
have Acked-by or Reviewed-by (patches 0016 and up) and grab any that
are in your area of interest into TIP tree. I'm expecting completion of this
series to take a couple of releases to get everything applied. But it would
be very nice if this patch bomb gets smaller each time.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists