linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/sgx: Explicitly give up the CPU in EDMM's ioctl() to avoid softlockup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D0S5S2NL1N5P.3Q0SM01VIZBJX@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:02:14 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Bojun Zhu" <zhubojun.zbj@...group.com>, "Huang, Kai"
 <kai.huang@...el.com>, "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
 <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: 刘双(轩屹) <ls123674@...group.com>, "Chatre,
 Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/sgx: Explicitly give up the CPU in EDMM's
 ioctl() to avoid softlockup

On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 9:46 AM EEST, Bojun Zhu wrote:
> Based on the the discussion among you, Jarkko and Reinette,
> I will keep the need_resched() and wrap the logic in using sgx_resched(),
> as suggested by Jarkko.

Sounds like a plan :-)

> Regards,
>
> Bojun

BR, Jarkko