linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/sgx: Explicitly give up the CPU in EDMM's ioctl() to avoid softlockup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:42:28 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>, "Bojun Zhu"
 <zhubojun.zbj@...group.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
 "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: 刘双(轩屹) <ls123674@...group.com>, "Chatre,
 Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/sgx: Explicitly give up the CPU in EDMM's
 ioctl() to avoid softlockup

On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 10:02 AM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 9:46 AM EEST, Bojun Zhu wrote:
> > Based on the the discussion among you, Jarkko and Reinette,
> > I will keep the need_resched() and wrap the logic in using sgx_resched(),
> > as suggested by Jarkko.
>
> Sounds like a plan :-)

In sgx_ioc_enclave_add_pages() "if (!c)" check might cause possibly
some  confusion.

Reason for it is that in "transaction sense" the operation can
be only meaningfully restarted when no pages have not been added
as MRENCLAVE checksum cannot be reset.

BR, Jarkko