linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] s390/pci: Drop unneeded reference to CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zij1fJw+Ksrq5iAm@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:05:49 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390/pci: Drop unneeded reference to CONFIG_DMI

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:34:49PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> I'm assuming this change should go via the s390 tree? So let me add the
> s390x architecture maintainers to pick this up, but from my side and
> considering that you maintain the SMBIOS/DMI support:

Hi Jean,

Whether this patch is good to go alone via s390 tree or (as Niklas
indicated) might depend on some SMBIOS/DMI update?

> Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>

Thanks!