linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] s390/pci: Drop unneeded reference to CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:08:23 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gerald Schaefer
 <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily
 Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] s390/pci: Drop unneeded reference to CONFIG_DMI

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:05:49 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:34:49PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > I'm assuming this change should go via the s390 tree? So let me add the
> > s390x architecture maintainers to pick this up, but from my side and
> > considering that you maintain the SMBIOS/DMI support:  
> 
> Hi Jean,
> 
> Whether this patch is good to go alone via s390 tree or (as Niklas
> indicated) might depend on some SMBIOS/DMI update?


It's good to go through the s390 tree, it's a simple clean-up which
doesn't depend on anything else.

> > Acked-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>  

Thanks to both of you!

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support