lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:30:35 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@...s.st.com>
Cc: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>,
	Pascal Paillet <p.paillet@...s.st.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: st: use a correct pwr compatible for stm32mp15

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:48:31AM +0200, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> 
> This patchset removes the unexpected comma in the PWR compatible
> "st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg" and uses a new compatible "st,stm32mp1-pwr-reg"
> in STM3MP15 device trees.

Why? I don't see any warnings from this. Yes, we wouldn't new cases 
following this pattern, but I don't think it is worth maintaining 
support for both strings. We're stuck with it. And the only way to 
maintain forward compatibility is:

compatible = "st,stm32mp1-pwr-reg", "st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg";

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ