[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e48f1dd1-fbe5-4461-b4bf-87acf8c0e318@proton.me>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:58:09 +0000
From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
To: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Michel Lespinasse <michel@...pinasse.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] rust: rbtree: add `RBTreeIteratorMut`
On 18.04.24 16:15, Matt Gilbride wrote:
> From: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>
>
> Add mutable Iterator implementation (`RBTreeIteratorMut`) for `RBTree`,
> allowing iteration over (key, value) pairs in key order. Only values are
> mutable, as mutating keys implies modifying a node's position in the tree.
>
> Mutable iteration is used by the binder driver during shutdown to
> clean up the tree maintained by the "range allocator" [1].
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20231101-rust-binder-v1-6-08ba9197f637@google.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Gilbride <mattgilbride@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/rbtree.rs | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
> index 2f836be7bdbe..50d440c9926d 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs
> @@ -222,6 +222,15 @@ pub fn iter(&self) -> RBTreeIterator<'_, K, V> {
> }
> }
>
> + /// Returns a mutable iterator over the tree nodes, sorted by key.
> + pub fn iter_mut(&mut self) -> RBTreeIteratorMut<'_, K, V> {
> + RBTreeIteratorMut {
This is missing an INVARIANT comment.
> + _tree: PhantomData,
> + // SAFETY: `root` is valid as it's embedded in `self` and we have a valid `self`.
> + next: unsafe { bindings::rb_first(&self.root) },
> + }
> + }
> +
> /// Returns an iterator over the keys of the nodes in the tree, in sorted order.
> pub fn keys(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'_ K> {
> self.iter().map(|(k, _)| k)
> @@ -231,6 +240,11 @@ pub fn keys(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'_ K> {
> pub fn values(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'_ V> {
> self.iter().map(|(_, v)| v)
> }
> +
> + /// Returns a mutable iterator over the values of the nodes in the tree, sorted by key.
> + pub fn values_mut(&mut self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &'_ mut V> {
> + self.iter_mut().map(|(_, v)| v)
> + }
> }
>
> impl<K, V> RBTree<K, V>
> @@ -466,6 +480,56 @@ fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
> }
> }
>
> +impl<'a, K, V> IntoIterator for &'a mut RBTree<K, V> {
> + type Item = (&'a K, &'a mut V);
> + type IntoIter = RBTreeIteratorMut<'a, K, V>;
> +
> + fn into_iter(self) -> Self::IntoIter {
> + self.iter_mut()
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/// A mutable iterator over the nodes of a [`RBTree`].
> +///
> +/// Instances are created by calling [`RBTree::iter_mut`].
> +///
> +/// # Invariants
> +/// - `self.next` is a valid pointer.
> +/// - `self.next` points to a node stored inside of a valid `RBTree`.
> +pub struct RBTreeIteratorMut<'a, K, V> {
I think the names `Iter` and `IterMut` are more natural. That is what
the collections in `std::collections` do. These are in the module
`rbtree`, so you can refer to them as `rbtree::Iter`.
> + _tree: PhantomData<&'a RBTree<K, V>>,
This should have the type `PhantomData<&'a mut RBTree<K, V>>`.
> + next: *mut bindings::rb_node,
> +}
You could create a common iterator type, since both `RBTreeIterator` and
`RBTreeIteratorMut` are very similar.
How about a (private) `RawIter`:
struct RawIter<K, V> {
next: *mut bindings::rb_node,
_phantom: PhantomData<fn() -> (K, V)>,
}
And implement `Iterator` with `Item = (*mut K, *mut V)` for `RawIter`.
Then you can change `Iter` to be:
pub struct Iter<'a, K, V> {
raw_iter: RawIter<K, V>,
_tree: PhantomData<&'a RBTree<K, V>>,
}
--
Cheers,
Benno
> +
> +// SAFETY: The [`RBTreeIterator`] gives out mutable references to K and V, so it has the same
> +// thread safety requirements as mutable references.
> +unsafe impl<'a, K: Send, V: Send> Send for RBTreeIteratorMut<'a, K, V> {}
> +
> +// SAFETY: The [`RBTreeIterator`] gives out mutable references to K and V, so it has the same
> +// thread safety requirements as mutable references.
> +unsafe impl<'a, K: Sync, V: Sync> Sync for RBTreeIteratorMut<'a, K, V> {}
> +
> +impl<'a, K, V> Iterator for RBTreeIteratorMut<'a, K, V> {
> + type Item = (&'a K, &'a mut V);
> +
> + fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
> + if self.next.is_null() {
> + return None;
> + }
> +
> + // SAFETY: By the type invariant of `Self`, all non-null `rb_node` pointers stored in `self`
> + // point to the links field of `Node<K, V>` objects.
> + let cur = unsafe { container_of!(self.next, Node<K, V>, links) }.cast_mut();
> +
> + // SAFETY: `self.next` is a valid tree node by the type invariants.
> + self.next = unsafe { bindings::rb_next(self.next) };
> +
> + // SAFETY: By the same reasoning above, it is safe to dereference the node. Additionally,
> + // it is ok to return a reference to members because the iterator must outlive it.
> + Some(unsafe { (&(*cur).key, &mut (*cur).value) })
> + }
> +}
> +
> /// A memory reservation for a red-black tree node.
> ///
> /// It contains the memory needed to hold a node that can be inserted into a red-black tree. One
>
> --
> 2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists