[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWryq6-W35ZyP4PAHJoJSA_7d2YV7zTG3vuL+WGa=_Mmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:41:30 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: weilin.wang@...el.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Retirement latency perf stat support
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:34 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Support 'R' as a retirement latency modifier on events. When present
> the evsel will fork perf record and perf report commands, parsing the
> perf report output as the count value. The intent is to do something
> similar to Weilin's series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240402214436.1409476-1-weilin.wang@intel.com/
>
> While the 'R' and the retirement latency are Intel specific, in the
> future I can imagine more evsel like commands that require child
> processes. We can make the logic more generic at that point.
>
> The code is untested on hardware that supports retirement latency, and
> with metrics with retirement latency in them. The record is also of
> sleep and various things need tweaking but I think v1 is good enough
> for people to give input.
>
> The first patch stops opening a dummy event for tool events. I came
> across this while looking into the issue and we can likely just pick
> it first. I kept it in the series for cleanliness sake.
>
> The code has benefitted greatly from Weilin's work and Namhyung's
> great review input.
I forgot to mention this is based on the tmp.perf-tools-next branch
due to the recent parse events clean ups that have already landed
there:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/log/?h=tmp.perf-tools-next
Thanks,
Ian
> Ian Rogers (3):
> perf evsel: Don't open tool events
> perf parse-events: Add a retirement latency modifier
> perf evsel: Add retirement latency event support
>
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 4 +
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 2 +
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.l | 3 +-
> 5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists