linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Retirement latency perf stat support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53dfaeae-b4eb-479e-938f-d0022c4f2416@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:22:05 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, weilin.wang@...el.com,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
 Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, Dmitrii Dolgov
 <9erthalion6@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 James Clark <james.clark@....com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Retirement latency perf stat support



On 2024-04-25 6:34 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> Support 'R' as a retirement latency modifier on events. When present
> the evsel will fork perf record and perf report commands, parsing the
> perf report output as the count value. The intent is to do something
> similar to Weilin's series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240402214436.1409476-1-weilin.wang@intel.com/
> 
> While the 'R' and the retirement latency are Intel specific, in the
> future I can imagine more evsel like commands that require child
> processes. We can make the logic more generic at that point.
>

I think in generic what we want is the weight/latency information of the
event. 'W' is already occupied by the weak group. Maybe 'L' is a more
generic name than 'R'. With the event modifier, perf collects and report
the weight/latency information of the event in a perf stat command.

Not just changing the evsel, I think a proper output is still required.
It's possible that an end user can use it without metrics. E.g.,
perf stat -e cycles,instructions:L
A possible generic output maybe

1,931,099,931	cycles
  801,826,458	instructions	# Avg Weight1 1000
				# Avg Weight2 800
				# Avg Weight3 500

Thanks,
Kan

> The code is untested on hardware that supports retirement latency, and
> with metrics with retirement latency in them. The record is also of
> sleep and various things need tweaking but I think v1 is good enough
> for people to give input.
> 
> The first patch stops opening a dummy event for tool events. I came
> across this while looking into the issue and we can likely just pick
> it first. I kept it in the series for cleanliness sake.
> 
> The code has benefitted greatly from Weilin's work and Namhyung's
> great review input.
> 
> Ian Rogers (3):
>   perf evsel: Don't open tool events
>   perf parse-events: Add a retirement latency modifier
>   perf evsel: Add retirement latency event support
> 
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c        | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.h        |   4 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c |   2 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.h |   1 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.l |   3 +-
>  5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>