[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mspigex0.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:00:27 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, "leit@...a.com" <leit@...a.com>,
"open list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw89)"
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless] wifi: rtw89: Un-embed dummy device
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> writes:
> Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> writes:
>
>> Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> wrote:
>>> Embedding net_device into structures prohibits the usage of flexible
>>> arrays in the net_device structure. For more details, see the discussion
>>> at [1].
>>>
>>> Un-embed the net_device from the private struct by converting it
>>> into a pointer. Then use the leverage the new alloc_netdev_dummy()
>>> helper to allocate and initialize dummy devices.
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240229225910.79e224cf@kernel.org/
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
>>
>> I think this patch should go via net-next tree, because wireless-next tree
>> doesn't have patch of dummy devices yet.
>>
>> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
>
> FWIW I sent the wireless-next pull request yesterday and once it pulled
> we will fast forward wireless-next to latest net-next.
Oh, I just realised that this is not CCed to netdev so their patchwork
won't even see the patch. Ping, I recommend that you wait for the
dependency commits to trickle down to your tree and then apply the
patch. That's the simplest approach and no need to resend anything.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists