linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH wireless] wifi: rtw89: Un-embed dummy device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <acda4194c8d44690b05b83adccb3aa22@realtek.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:15:21 +0000
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, "leit@...a.com" <leit@...a.com>,
        "open
 list:REALTEK WIRELESS DRIVER (rtw89)" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open
 list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH wireless] wifi: rtw89: Un-embed dummy device

Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> writes:
> >
> >> Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> wrote:
> >>> Embedding net_device into structures prohibits the usage of flexible
> >>> arrays in the net_device structure. For more details, see the discussion
> >>> at [1].
> >>>
> >>> Un-embed the net_device from the private struct by converting it
> >>> into a pointer. Then use the leverage the new alloc_netdev_dummy()
> >>> helper to allocate and initialize dummy devices.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240229225910.79e224cf@kernel.org/
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
> >>
> >> I think this patch should go via net-next tree, because wireless-next tree
> >> doesn't have patch of dummy devices yet.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
> >
> > FWIW I sent the wireless-next pull request yesterday and once it pulled
> > we will fast forward wireless-next to latest net-next.
> 
> Oh, I just realised that this is not CCed to netdev so their patchwork
> won't even see the patch. Ping, I recommend that you wait for the
> dependency commits to trickle down to your tree and then apply the
> patch. That's the simplest approach and no need to resend anything.

Okay. If we don't hurry to get this patch merged, I will apply this patch
to my tree.