linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <DU0PR04MB9417C67342B1DD6CC299B4CE88172@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:06:00 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo
	<shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix
 Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Peng
 Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian Marussi
	<cristian.marussi@....com>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties
 for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions

Hi Rob,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties
> for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions
> 
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:53:17AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by SCMI firmware using OEM extensions. This
> > patch is to add i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions properties.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml     |  9 ++-
> >  .../bindings/firmware/nxp,imx95-scmi-pinctrl.yaml  | 66
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml

...

> > +
> > +title: i.MX System Control and Management Interface (SCMI) Pinctrl
> > +Protocol
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > +
> > +patternProperties:
> > +  '[a-f0-9]+$':
> > +    type: object
> > +    unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +    properties:
> > +      pins:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> > +        description: name of the pin
> > +        items:
> > +          enum: [ daptdi, daptmsswdio, daptclkswclk, daptdotraceswo,
> > +                  gpioio00, gpioio01, gpioio02, gpioio03, gpioio04,
> 
> ioio?

Yes. The name is exported from SCMI firmware.

> 
> > +                  gpioio05, gpioio06, gpioio07, gpioio08, gpioio09,
> > +                  gpioio10, gpioio11, gpioio12, gpioio13, gpioio14,
> > +                  gpioio15, gpioio16, gpioio17, gpioio18, gpioio19,
> > +                  gpioio20, gpioio21, gpioio22, gpioio23, gpioio24,
> > +                  gpioio25, gpioio26, gpioio27, gpioio28, gpioio29,
> > +                  gpioio30, gpioio31, gpioio32, gpioio33, gpioio34,
> > +                  gpioio35, gpioio36, gpioio37, ccmclko1, ccmclko2,
> > +                  ccmclko3, ccmclko4, enet1mdc, enet1mdio, enet1td3,
> > +                  enet1td2, enet1td1, enet1td0, enet1txctl, enet1txc,
> > +                  enet1rxctl, enet1rxc, enet1rd0, enet1rd1, enet1rd2,
> > +                  enet1rd3, enet2mdc, enet2mdio, enet2td3, enet2td2,
> > +                  enet2td1, enet2td0, enet2txctl, enet2txc, enet2rxctl,
> > +                  enet2rxc, enet2rd0, enet2rd1, enet2rd2, enet2rd3,
> > +                  sd1clk, sd1cmd, sd1data0, sd1data1, sd1data2, sd1data3,
> > +                  sd1data4, sd1data5, sd1data6, sd1data7, sd1strobe,
> > +                  sd2vselect, sd3clk, sd3cmd, sd3data0, sd3data1,
> > +                  sd3data2, sd3data3, xspi1data0, xspi1data1, xspi1data2,
> > +                  xspi1data3, xspi1data4, xspi1data5, xspi1data6,
> > +                  xspi1data7, xspi1dqs, xspi1sclk, xspi1ss0b, xspi1ss1b,
> > +                  sd2cdb, sd2clk, sd2cmd, sd2data0, sd2data1, sd2data2,
> > +                  sd2data3, sd2resetb, i2c1scl, i2c1sda, i2c2scl, i2c2sda,
> > +                  uart1rxd, uart1txd, uart2rxd, uart2txd, pdmclk,
> > +                  pdmbitstream0, pdmbitstream1, sai1txfs, sai1txc,
> > +                  sai1txd0, sai1rxd0, wdogany, fccuerr0 ]
> > +
> > +      nxp,func-id:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +        description: Indicates the PAD connections which function
> > + module
> 
> The description makes no sense...

I will use below description in v3:
For each pin, there are up to 8 muxing options (called ALT modes). For example:
Select 1 of 5 iomux modes to be used for pad: DAP_TCLK_SWCLK.
000b - Select mux mode: ALT0 mux port: JTAG_MUX_TCK of instance: jtag_mux
010b - Select mux mode: ALT2 mux port: CAN4_RX of instance: imx95_wakeupmix_top
100b - Select mux mode: ALT4 mux port: FLEXIO1_FLEXIO30 of instance: imx95_wakeupmix_top
101b - Select mux mode: ALT5 mux port: GPIO3_IO30 of instance: imx95_wakeupmix_top
110b - Select mux mode: ALT6 mux port: LPUART5_CTS_B of instance: imx95_wakeupmix_top
The nxp,func-id property is selecting one ALT mode.

> 
> > +
> > +      nxp,pin-conf:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +        description: The PAD configuration
> 
> PAD stands for? Or is it pin configuration as the property name says?

It is pin configuration which includes pull up/down, drive strength and etc.

> 
> This is just a raw register values? 

Yes.

Why can't standard pinctrl properties be
> used here. What's the point of using SCMI pinctrl if you are just shuttling
> register values to SCMI?

Standard pinctrl properties will need more memory in our SCMI
firmware design. We have limited on-chip memory for SCMI firmware usage.


> 
> > +
> > +      nxp,daisy-id:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +        description: The select input register ID
> > +
> > +      nxp,daisy-conf:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > +        description: The select input register value
> 
> I remember some daisy chaining stuff in iomuxc, but otherwise
> 
> What's the relationship between these 2 properties? Is it valid if only
> 1 is present? I doubt it.

The scmi firmware will convert the daisy-id into register address, and
write the daisy-conf value into the register.

 Looks like an address and value pair. Either the
> schema needs to define allowed combinations

The firmware will check whether id and conf is valid, is there a need to define
allowed combinations? There will be lots of check to define allowed
combinations.

 or design the properties in a
> way you don't have too. IOW, make a single property that's a tuple of register
> ID and value.

Define tuple will make the property not able to use linux generic pinconf
driver. The current parse_dt_cfg for custom_dt_params only support a
single u32 value and not easy to support tuple.


So could we just ignore the allowed combinations and use not tuple?

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Rob