| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvFamPhLn-EVQjiaXibC7hmDYoOeMzTEUWer1xmYLw38g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:36:52 +0530 From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.8 000/158] 6.8.8-rc1 review On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:10, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:11, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.8.8 release. > > There are 158 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.8.8-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.8.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64, x86_64, and i386. > > One regression on arm, > the TI BeagleBoard-X15 device kunit test boot failed and > it is always reproducible. > > Not a problem on qemu-armv7. > > However, I am bisecting this problem and let you know shortly. After investigation it is found that it is an intermittent issue where log-in prompt was not successful intermittently and results showed a boot failed but it is not. However, This is not regression. Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org> ## Build * kernel: 6.8.8-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-6.8.y * git commit: 9919cd9ab98868581abf895dc0913cb6760c176f * git describe: v6.8.7-159-g9919cd9ab988 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.8.y/build/v6.8.7-159-g9919cd9ab988 ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.8.7) ## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.8.7) ## Test Fixes (compared to v6.8.7) ## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.8.7) ## Test result summary total: 183677, pass: 159323, fail: 2769, skip: 21350, xfail: 235 ## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 128 total, 128 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 38 total, 38 passed, 0 failed * i386: 29 total, 29 passed, 0 failed * mips: 23 total, 23 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 17 total, 17 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-livepatch * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mm * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-watchdog * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-smoketest * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * perf * rcutorture -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists