linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add compatible line for XR20M1172 UART

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZioeTQZ6i0FbcDIv@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:11:41 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: "Konstantin P." <ria.freelander@...il.com>
Cc: Konstantin Pugin <rilian.la.te@...ru>, krzk@...nel.org,
	conor@...nel.org, lkp@...el.com, vz@...ia.com, robh@...nel.org,
	jcmvbkbc@...il.com, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
	manikanta.guntupalli@....com, corbet@....net, ychuang3@...oton.com,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, Maarten.Brock@...ls.nl,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
	Lech Perczak <lech.perczak@...lingroup.com>,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] dt-bindings: sc16is7xx: Add compatible line for
 XR20M1172 UART

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:25:41AM +0300, Konstantin P. wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:34 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:19 PM Konstantin Pugin <rilian.la.te@...ru> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Konstantin Pugin <ria.freelander@...il.com>
> > >
> > > EXAR XR20M1172 UART is mostly register-compatible with NXP SPI UARTs.
> > > It will be handled by same driver, so, it makes sense to add DT
> > > definition for these block into driver's documentation.
> >
> > blocks

..

> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
> >
> > Hmm... Did I? IIRC I only reviewed patches 1 and 3. Am I mistaken?
> 
> I think it is my mistake, not yours. If you want, I can do a new
> version without a tag.

Yes, but give a chance to others to have a look at the code and the rest.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko