linux-kernel - Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:08:44 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
Subject: Re: API break, sysfs "capability" file

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:09:35AM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Jens, quick question: what's the plan forward here and who will realize
> what you outlined?
> 
> I'm asking, as afaics nothing happened for a week (hope I didn't miss
> anything!). Sure, it's not a regression from the last cycle or so, so
> it's not that urgent. But hch's "It is not a regression at all" last
> week made me worry that this in the end might not be solved unless
> somebody has it on the todo list. Normally I would have CCed Linus at
> that point anyway to get his stance, but from your statements it sounds
> like this is unnecessary here.

I'll get to adding a real interface in a bit.  Sorry, I've been
a little too busy the last days.