linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add K3 AM64x SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:52:39 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add K3 AM64x SoCs

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:03:36PM -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 4/25/24 12:15 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:36:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:06:09 -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> > > > From: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
> > > > 
> > > > K3 AM64x SoC has a Cortex M4F subsystem in the MCU voltage domain.
> > > > The remote processor's life cycle management and IPC mechanisms are
> > > > similar across the R5F and M4F cores from remote processor driver
> > > > point of view. However, there are subtle differences in image loading
> > > > and starting the M4F subsystems.
> > > > 
> > > > The YAML binding document provides the various node properties to be
> > > > configured by the consumers of the M4F subsystem.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@...com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml  | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
> > > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> > > 
> > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > > 
> > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> > > Warning: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
> > 
> > The file is now in dt-schema:
> > https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
> 
> So should I use "reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml" here, or just
> drop this line completely?

The only other example that I could find that didn't reference the text
binding (which points to dt-schema) said:
"(see reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml in dtschema project)"

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)