[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zivb7qs4gSywzVsL@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:53:02 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...ux.microsoft.com>, nathan@...nel.org,
kotaranov@...rosoft.com, sharmaajay@...rosoft.com,
longli@...rosoft.com, leon@...nel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/1] RDMA/mana_ib: fix missing ret value
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:03:15PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:15:51AM -0700, Konstantin Taranov wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > Set ret to -ENODEV when netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu
> > returns NULL.
> >
> > Fixes: 8b184e4f1c32 ("RDMA/mana_ib: Enable RoCE on port 1")
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/mana/device.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Applied to for-next, thanks
So, what's wrong with my patch that had been sent _before_ this one?
At bare minimum I would like to see an explanation.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists