[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb603991-5db3-4173-8418-d61577b7e614@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:56:28 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, semen.protsenko@...aro.org
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: google,gs101-pinctrl
needs a clock
On 26/04/2024 12:54, André Draszik wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 20:18 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/04/2024 20:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + contains:
>>>> + const: google,gs101-pinctrl
>>>> + then:
>>>> + required:
>>>> + - clocks
>>>> + - clock-names
>>>
>>> else:
>>> properties:
>>> clocks: false
>>> clock-names: false
>>>
>>> but anyway this is all a bit fragile, because pinctrl is not a driver
>>> and you rely on initcall ordering.
>>
>> It is a driver, although initcall ordering is still there. Anyway, it's
>> the first soc requiring clock for pinctrl
>
> If I see it right, E850 has similar gates, and like on gs101 they're currently
> also all marked as CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED in the e850 clock driver with a comment that
> a driver update is needed. I've added Sam.
Cool, so this should solve also Sam's problem. Sam, can you test the
patchset in spare time?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists