lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240426114552.667346-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:45:52 +0200
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: selftests: Use TAP interface in the set_memory_region test

Use the kselftest_harness.h interface in this test to get TAP
output, so that it is easier for the user to see what the test
is doing. (Note: We are not using the KVM_ONE_VCPU_TEST_SUITE()
macro here since these tests are creating their VMs with the
vm_create_barebones() function, not with vm_create_with_one_vcpu())

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
 v2:
 - Rebase to linux-next branch
 - Make "loops" variable static
 - Added Andrew's Reviewed-by

 .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c    | 86 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
index 68c899d27561..a5c9bee5235a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <test_util.h>
 #include <kvm_util.h>
 #include <processor.h>
+#include "kselftest_harness.h"
 
 /*
  * s390x needs at least 1MB alignment, and the x86_64 MOVE/DELETE tests need a
@@ -38,6 +39,8 @@ extern const uint64_t final_rip_end;
 
 static sem_t vcpu_ready;
 
+static int loops;
+
 static inline uint64_t guest_spin_on_val(uint64_t spin_val)
 {
 	uint64_t val;
@@ -219,6 +222,13 @@ static void test_move_memory_region(void)
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
 
+TEST(move_in_use_region)
+{
+	ksft_print_msg("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
+	for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++)
+		test_move_memory_region();
+}
+
 static void guest_code_delete_memory_region(void)
 {
 	uint64_t val;
@@ -308,12 +318,19 @@ static void test_delete_memory_region(void)
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
 
-static void test_zero_memory_regions(void)
+TEST(delete_in_use_region)
+{
+	ksft_print_msg("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
+	for (int i = 0; i < loops; i++)
+		test_delete_memory_region();
+}
+
+TEST(zero_memory_regions)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
 
-	pr_info("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n");
+	ksft_print_msg("Testing KVM_RUN with zero added memory regions\n");
 
 	vm = vm_create_barebones();
 	vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
@@ -326,7 +343,7 @@ static void test_zero_memory_regions(void)
 }
 #endif /* __x86_64__ */
 
-static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void)
+TEST(invalid_memory_region_flags)
 {
 	uint32_t supported_flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES;
 	const uint32_t v2_only_flags = KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD;
@@ -389,7 +406,7 @@ static void test_invalid_memory_region_flags(void)
  * Test it can be added memory slots up to KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS, then any
  * tentative to add further slots should fail.
  */
-static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void)
+TEST(add_max_memory_regions)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
@@ -408,13 +425,13 @@ static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void)
 	max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
 	TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 0,
 		    "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 0");
-	pr_info("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots);
+	ksft_print_msg("Allowed number of memory slots: %i\n", max_mem_slots);
 
 	vm = vm_create_barebones();
 
 	/* Check it can be added memory slots up to the maximum allowed */
-	pr_info("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n",
-		(max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10);
+	ksft_print_msg("Adding slots 0..%i, each memory region with %dK size\n",
+		       (max_mem_slots - 1), MEM_REGION_SIZE >> 10);
 
 	mem = mmap(NULL, (size_t)max_mem_slots * MEM_REGION_SIZE + alignment,
 		   PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
@@ -455,12 +472,21 @@ static void test_invalid_guest_memfd(struct kvm_vm *vm, int memfd,
 	TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "%s", msg);
 }
 
-static void test_add_private_memory_region(void)
+static bool has_cap_guest_memfd(void)
+{
+	return kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) &&
+	       (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM));
+}
+
+TEST(add_private_memory_region)
 {
 	struct kvm_vm *vm, *vm2;
 	int memfd, i;
 
-	pr_info("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
+	if (!has_cap_guest_memfd())
+		SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM");
+
+	ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
 
 	vm = vm_create_barebones_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM);
 
@@ -491,13 +517,16 @@ static void test_add_private_memory_region(void)
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
 
-static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void)
+TEST(add_overlapping_private_memory_regions)
 {
 	struct kvm_vm *vm;
 	int memfd;
 	int r;
 
-	pr_info("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
+	if (!has_cap_guest_memfd())
+		SKIP(return, "Missing KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD / KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM");
+
+	ksft_print_msg("Testing ADD of overlapping KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
 
 	vm = vm_create_barebones_type(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM);
 
@@ -536,46 +565,15 @@ static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void)
 	close(memfd);
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
+
 #endif
 
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
-#ifdef __x86_64__
-	int i, loops;
-
-	/*
-	 * FIXME: the zero-memslot test fails on aarch64 and s390x because
-	 * KVM_RUN fails with ENOEXEC or EFAULT.
-	 */
-	test_zero_memory_regions();
-#endif
-
-	test_invalid_memory_region_flags();
-
-	test_add_max_memory_regions();
-
-#ifdef __x86_64__
-	if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) &&
-	    (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM))) {
-		test_add_private_memory_region();
-		test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions();
-	} else {
-		pr_info("Skipping tests for KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
-	}
-
 	if (argc > 1)
 		loops = atoi_positive("Number of iterations", argv[1]);
 	else
 		loops = 10;
 
-	pr_info("Testing MOVE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
-	for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
-		test_move_memory_region();
-
-	pr_info("Testing DELETE of in-use region, %d loops\n", loops);
-	for (i = 0; i < loops; i++)
-		test_delete_memory_region();
-#endif
-
-	return 0;
+	return test_harness_run(argc, argv);
 }
-- 
2.44.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ