linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: ip_md_tunnel_xmit+0x9e (section: .text) -> .LBB102 (section: .init.text)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 10:21:20 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference:
 ip_md_tunnel_xmit+0x9e (section: .text) -> .LBB102 (section: .init.text)

On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 02:48, Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 05:29:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head:   3022bf37da50ce0ee3ba443ec5f86fa8c28aacd0
> > commit: 83092341e15d0dfee1caa8dc502f66c815ccd78a gpio: cdev: fix missed label sanitizing in debounce_setup()
> > date:   3 weeks ago
> > config: riscv-randconfig-r021-20230409 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240427/202404270534.8VgyE2XE-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240427/202404270534.8VgyE2XE-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404270534.8VgyE2XE-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
> >
>
> Bart,
>
> does this make any sense to you, cos I'm not seeing any connection
> between that commit and these warnings?
>
> Cheers,
> Kent.
>

I think this is a false positive.

Bart