linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp_bbr: replace lambda expression with bitwise operation for bit flip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 16:31:58 +0800
From: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp_bbr: replace lambda expression with bitwise
 operation for bit flip

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:19:02PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 01:01:21AM +0800, I Hsin Cheng wrote:
> 
> > I see, thanks for your explanation.
> > I thought the compilers behavior might alters due to different 
> > architecture or different compilers.
> > So would you recommend on the proposed changes or we should stick to
> >  the original implementation? 
> > Personally I think my version or your proposed change are both more 
> > understandable and elegant than the lambda expression.
> 
> Out of curiosity, where do you see any lambda expressions in the entire
> thing?

Sorry, it's my fault to address the expression as "lambda expression",
it should be called as "conditional" or "ternary" operator.

Thanks for your remind.