[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3yj4eo4ww6wfz4ggaurutemobxi7pwdg7gctnhmwytalimpdcz@hve522lspsdv>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:32:55 +0300
From: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/141] 6.1.88-rc1 review
Greg,
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release.
> > There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> As Pavel reported,
>
> LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1.
>
> The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc
> linux.6.1.y branch.
>
> arm:
> * omap2plus_defconfig - failed
> * defconfig - failed
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the
build regression on ARM32.
Thanks,
>
> Suspecting commit :
> -------
> ASoC: ti: Convert Pandora ASoC to GPIO descriptors
> [ Upstream commit 319e6ac143b9e9048e527ab9dd2aabb8fdf3d60f ]
>
> Build log:
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:259:15: error: variable
> 'pandora_soc_audio_gpios' has initializer but incomplete type
> 259 | static struct gpiod_lookup_table pandora_soc_audio_gpios = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:260:10: error: 'struct
> gpiod_lookup_table' has no member named 'dev_id'
> 260 | .dev_id = "soc-audio",
> | ^~~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:260:19: warning: excess elements in
> struct initializer
> 260 | .dev_id = "soc-audio",
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:260:19: note: (near initialization
> for 'pandora_soc_audio_gpios')
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:261:10: error: 'struct
> gpiod_lookup_table' has no member named 'table'
> 261 | .table = {
> | ^~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:261:18: error: extra brace group at
> end of initializer
> 261 | .table = {
> | ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:261:18: note: (near initialization
> for 'pandora_soc_audio_gpios')
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:262:17: error: implicit declaration
> of function 'GPIO_LOOKUP'; did you mean 'IOP_LOOKUP'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 262 | GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio-112-127", 6, "dac", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> | IOP_LOOKUP
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:262:55: error: 'GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH'
> undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH'?
> 262 | GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio-112-127", 6, "dac", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:264:17: error: extra brace group at
> end of initializer
> 264 | { }
> | ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:264:17: note: (near initialization
> for 'pandora_soc_audio_gpios')
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:261:18: warning: excess elements in
> struct initializer
> 261 | .table = {
> | ^
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:261:18: note: (near initialization
> for 'pandora_soc_audio_gpios')
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c: In function 'omap3_pandora_legacy_init':
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:271:9: error: implicit declaration
> of function 'gpiod_add_lookup_table'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 271 | gpiod_add_lookup_table(&pandora_soc_audio_gpios);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c: At top level:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:259:34: error: storage size of
> 'pandora_soc_audio_gpios' isn't known
> 259 | static struct gpiod_lookup_table pandora_soc_audio_gpios = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.o] Error 1
>
>
> steps to reproduce:
> ---
> # tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm --toolchain gcc-13
> --kconfig omap2plus_defconfig
>
>
> Links
> ---
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2fWG4dRZzA7WgJqyLQ8Rm05WTUo/
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.87-142-gcde450ef0f2f/testrun/23640116/suite/build/test/gcc-13-omap2plus_defconfig/details/
>
> --
> Linaro LKFT
> https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists