[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86374002-4585-4e61-8414-33c7612bf940@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:24:16 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/141] 6.1.88-rc1 review
On 4/28/24 05:32, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release.
>>> There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> As Pavel reported,
>>
>> LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1.
>>
>> The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc
>> linux.6.1.y branch.
>>
>> arm:
>> * omap2plus_defconfig - failed
>> * defconfig - failed
>>
>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the
> build regression on ARM32.
>
It would also be interesting to understand why commit 0f4048e1a0c6 ("ASoC:
ti: Convert Pandora ASoC to GPIO descriptors") was necessary. It doesn't
immediately look like a bug fix.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists