[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024042950-zesty-napping-e524@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 12:21:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/141] 6.1.88-rc1 review
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 03:32:55PM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release.
> > > There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > As Pavel reported,
> >
> > LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1.
> >
> > The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc
> > linux.6.1.y branch.
> >
> > arm:
> > * omap2plus_defconfig - failed
> > * defconfig - failed
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the
> build regression on ARM32.
Because I missed this, I thought I had dropped it already, sorry about
that. I'll go do a new release with this commit reverted.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists