linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95e3e9af-a7e7-732c-1e76-680765414ef1@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:13:08 -0700
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Greg KH
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)

On 4/28/2024 1:01 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 27.04.24 13:14, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>>> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
>> What fix?
> 
> FWIW, this one:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
> 
> But sadly the review is still pending (and hence it's not yet eligible
> for inclusion in stable afaics):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ded3e7ae-6a7d-48b2-8acc-c125874ee09f@leemhuis.info/

The team that deals with this driver had holidays last week so that 
delayed things a bit. I was able to touch base with them today and the 
patch has been sent to netdev.

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240429171040.1152516-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/

Thanks,
Tony

> HTH, Ciao, Thorsten