[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d217722-3cb7-436c-b445-17e6a3d7cd11@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:19:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>, gaurav.jain@....com,
horia.geanta@....com, V.Sethi@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, iuliana.prodan@....com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] caam: init-clk based on caam-page0-access
On 29/04/2024 08:28, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> v4:
> - Correct the null pointer checking
>
> v3:
> - Splitting the patch into two.
> - Disposed-off comments received on v2.
>
> v2:
> - Considering the OPTEE enablement check too, for setting the
> variable 'reg_access'.
>
> Pankaj Gupta (2):
> caam: init-clk based on caam-page0-access
> drivers: crypto: caam: i.MX8ULP donot have CAAM page0 access
>
Two patches here, 5 patches in patchset, some with entirely different
patch prefixes.
Bring some order to this.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists