linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/8] spi: imx: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240429112843.67628-4-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:28:36 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] spi: imx: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-imx.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
index c3e5cee18bea..f4006c82f867 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
@@ -1405,7 +1405,7 @@ static int spi_imx_dma_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
 {
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc_tx, *desc_rx;
 	unsigned long transfer_timeout;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 	struct spi_controller *controller = spi_imx->controller;
 	struct sg_table *tx = &transfer->tx_sg, *rx = &transfer->rx_sg;
 	struct scatterlist *last_sg = sg_last(rx->sgl, rx->nents);
@@ -1471,18 +1471,18 @@ static int spi_imx_dma_transfer(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
 	transfer_timeout = spi_imx_calculate_timeout(spi_imx, transfer->len);
 
 	/* Wait SDMA to finish the data transfer.*/
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spi_imx->dma_tx_completion,
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spi_imx->dma_tx_completion,
 						transfer_timeout);
-	if (!timeout) {
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_err(spi_imx->dev, "I/O Error in DMA TX\n");
 		dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_tx);
 		dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_rx);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
 	}
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spi_imx->dma_rx_completion,
-					      transfer_timeout);
-	if (!timeout) {
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spi_imx->dma_rx_completion,
+						transfer_timeout);
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_err(&controller->dev, "I/O Error in DMA RX\n");
 		spi_imx->devtype_data->reset(spi_imx);
 		dmaengine_terminate_all(controller->dma_rx);
@@ -1501,7 +1501,7 @@ static int spi_imx_pio_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
 {
 	struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx = spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller);
 	unsigned long transfer_timeout;
-	unsigned long timeout;
+	unsigned long time_left;
 
 	spi_imx->tx_buf = transfer->tx_buf;
 	spi_imx->rx_buf = transfer->rx_buf;
@@ -1517,9 +1517,9 @@ static int spi_imx_pio_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
 
 	transfer_timeout = spi_imx_calculate_timeout(spi_imx, transfer->len);
 
-	timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spi_imx->xfer_done,
-					      transfer_timeout);
-	if (!timeout) {
+	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&spi_imx->xfer_done,
+						transfer_timeout);
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "I/O Error in PIO\n");
 		spi_imx->devtype_data->reset(spi_imx);
 		return -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.43.0