[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240429112843.67628-6-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:28:38 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] spi: pic32: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c
index 709edb70ad7d..b8bcc220e96d 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int pic32_spi_one_transfer(struct spi_controller *host,
{
struct pic32_spi *pic32s;
bool dma_issued = false;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
int ret;
pic32s = spi_controller_get_devdata(host);
@@ -545,8 +545,8 @@ static int pic32_spi_one_transfer(struct spi_controller *host,
}
/* wait for completion */
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&pic32s->xfer_done, 2 * HZ);
- if (timeout == 0) {
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&pic32s->xfer_done, 2 * HZ);
+ if (time_left == 0) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "wait error/timedout\n");
if (dma_issued) {
dmaengine_terminate_all(host->dma_rx);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists