linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] ACPI/NUMA: Add log messages for memory ranges found in CEDT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <663126da389b7_10c2129445@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:14:02 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Dan Williams
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>, Len Brown
	<lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] ACPI/NUMA: Add log messages for memory ranges
 found in CEDT

Robert Richter wrote:
> Adding a pr_info() when successfully adding a CFMWS memory range.
> 
> Suggested-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 76b39a6d3aef..34ecf2dc912f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -339,8 +339,12 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
>  	 * window.
>  	 */
>  	modified = numa_fill_memblks(start, end);
> -	if (modified != NUMA_NO_MEMBLK)
> +	if (modified != NUMA_NO_MEMBLK) {
> +		if (modified)
> +			pr_info("CEDT: memblk extended [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n",
> +				(unsigned long long) start, (unsigned long long) end - 1);

This one still feels too verbose to me, can it not be gleaned from other
startup messages?