[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f53a87ed-c3fe-4a60-8723-3eea25189553@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:49:31 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb
On 12.04.24 16:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This is v2 of [1] with changed subject:
> "[PATCH v1 0/5] s390: page_mapcount(), page_has_private() and PG_arch_1"
>
> Rebased on s390x/features which contains the page_mapcount() and
> page_has_private() cleanups, and some PG_arch_1 cleanups from Willy. To
> compensate, I added some more cleanups ;)
>
> One "easy" fix upfront. Another issue I spotted is documented in [1].
>
> Once this hits upstream, we can remove HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_PAGE_ACCESSIBLE
> from core-mm and s390x, so only the folio variant will remain.
Ping.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists