[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506083830.28332-B-hca@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 10:38:30 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] s390: PG_arch_1+folio cleanups for uv+hugetlb
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:49:31PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.04.24 16:21, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > This is v2 of [1] with changed subject:
> > "[PATCH v1 0/5] s390: page_mapcount(), page_has_private() and PG_arch_1"
> >
> > Rebased on s390x/features which contains the page_mapcount() and
> > page_has_private() cleanups, and some PG_arch_1 cleanups from Willy. To
> > compensate, I added some more cleanups ;)
> >
> > One "easy" fix upfront. Another issue I spotted is documented in [1].
> >
> > Once this hits upstream, we can remove HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_PAGE_ACCESSIBLE
> > from core-mm and s390x, so only the folio variant will remain.
>
> Ping.
Claudio, Janosch, this series requires your review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists