linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] slimbus: patches for v6.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a987385c-d241-4527-acd5-31767c62317f@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:03:38 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slimbus: patches for v6.10



On 30/04/2024 09:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:50:03AM +0100, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>
>> Here are few patches in slimbus for 6.10 that includes
>> - fixing autoloading.
>> - coverting driver remove to return void
>> - some timeout fixes on wait operation.
>>
>> Please note that, I have also included a fix at the start of this series
>> rather than sending another email thread. I hope that is okay with you.
>>
>> Can you please queue them up for 6.10
> 
> Shouldn't the first commit go to 6.9?  If so, why include it here?

Yes, first commit should go to 6.9, Do you want me to resend the series 
without that patch or are you okay to pick it this time?

I sent the fix with this series because it was just one patch, and we 
are almost near to rc7.


thanks for your help.

-srini
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h