linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] slimbus: patches for v6.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024043006-palpable-tipoff-1ce2@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:09:49 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slimbus: patches for v6.10

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:03:38AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30/04/2024 09:56, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 09:50:03AM +0100, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
> > > From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> > > 
> > > Here are few patches in slimbus for 6.10 that includes
> > > - fixing autoloading.
> > > - coverting driver remove to return void
> > > - some timeout fixes on wait operation.
> > > 
> > > Please note that, I have also included a fix at the start of this series
> > > rather than sending another email thread. I hope that is okay with you.
> > > 
> > > Can you please queue them up for 6.10
> > 
> > Shouldn't the first commit go to 6.9?  If so, why include it here?
> 
> Yes, first commit should go to 6.9, Do you want me to resend the series
> without that patch or are you okay to pick it this time?

Please do so, send 2 series, one with one patch and one with the rest.
Remember, tools like 'b4' want to take the whole series at once.

> I sent the fix with this series because it was just one patch, and we are
> almost near to rc7.

It's ok, I have other fixes to send for -final.

thanks,

greg k-h