[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240430114142.28551-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:41:33 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] spi: armada-3700: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c b/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c
index 3c9ed412932f..02c1e625742d 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-armada-3700.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static irqreturn_t a3700_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
static bool a3700_spi_wait_completion(struct spi_device *spi)
{
struct a3700_spi *a3700_spi;
- unsigned int timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
unsigned int ctrl_reg;
unsigned long timeout_jiffies;
@@ -361,12 +361,12 @@ static bool a3700_spi_wait_completion(struct spi_device *spi)
a3700_spi->wait_mask);
timeout_jiffies = msecs_to_jiffies(A3700_SPI_TIMEOUT);
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&a3700_spi->done,
- timeout_jiffies);
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&a3700_spi->done,
+ timeout_jiffies);
a3700_spi->wait_mask = 0;
- if (timeout)
+ if (time_left)
return true;
/* there might be the case that right after we checked the
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists