[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240430114142.28551-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:41:36 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
To: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/8] spi: pic32-sqi: use 'time_left' variable with wait_for_completion_timeout()
There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
---
drivers/spi/spi-pic32-sqi.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32-sqi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32-sqi.c
index 3f1e5b27776b..0031063a7e25 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32-sqi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32-sqi.c
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static int pic32_sqi_one_message(struct spi_controller *host,
struct spi_transfer *xfer;
struct pic32_sqi *sqi;
int ret = 0, mode;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
u32 val;
sqi = spi_controller_get_devdata(host);
@@ -410,8 +410,8 @@ static int pic32_sqi_one_message(struct spi_controller *host,
writel(val, sqi->regs + PESQI_BD_CTRL_REG);
/* wait for xfer completion */
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sqi->xfer_done, 5 * HZ);
- if (timeout == 0) {
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sqi->xfer_done, 5 * HZ);
+ if (time_left == 0) {
dev_err(&sqi->host->dev, "wait timedout/interrupted\n");
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
msg->status = ret;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists