[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96fe85f7-eaf1-4231-985b-14514cf53f3d@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 10:19:18 -0400
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] usb: gadget: function: move u_f.h to
include/linux/usb/
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 10:38:11AM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 09:51:20PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 01:33:26AM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> > > We move the u_f.h header to include/linux/usb to be
> > > able to compile function drivers outside of the
> > > drivers/usb/gadget/function directory.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@...gutronix.de>
> >
> > Given that you're moving a private header file to a public location,
> > don't you think it should now have a name that's more meaningful to
> > general kernel developers than "u_f.h"?
>
> Fair point.
>
> How about func_utils.h instead?
Yes, that would be a lot better. Especially if you put it in
include/linux/usb/gadget rather than include/linux/usb.
Thanks.
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists