linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error interrupts unmasking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78395aa9-5871-4db1-8232-ffdaacc7671a@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 22:07:45 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ramón Nordin Rodriguez <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se>
Cc: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com,
	ruanjinjie@...wei.com, steen.hegelund@...rochip.com,
	vladimir.oltean@....com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com, Pier.Beruto@...emi.com,
	Selvamani.Rajagopal@...emi.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
	benjamin.bigler@...nformulastudent.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/12] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: implement error
 interrupts unmasking

> I don't have access to a logic analyzer but my old oscilloscope is
> almost reliable. I could confirm that the spi clock is indeed running at
> the expected 25MHz, but I could observe some gaps of up to 320µs so
> that's 8k spi cycles spent doing something else.
> These gaps were observed on the SPI clock and the macphy interrupt was
> active for the same ammount of time(though this was measured independently
> and not on the same trigger).
> I've been drinking way to much coffe, so soldering is not gonna happen
> today (shaky hands), but if it helps I can solder wires to attach both
> probes to confirm that the gap in the SPI clock happens at the same time
> or not as the interrupt is active.

What i expect you will see is that the interrupt line goes active. A
while later there is an SPI bus transfer to fetch the interrupt
status, and when that transfer completes the interrupt should go
inactive. But you will need your second channel to confirm this.

One question would be, is 320µs reasonable for an interrupt, and one
SPI transfer?

I would then expect a number of back to back transfers, each around 64
bytes in size, as it gets the received frame. The gaps between those
transfers will be interesting.

	Andrew