lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <23A87C03-EB55-49A1-BB55-B6136117F0B6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 14:42:38 +0900
From: "D. Jeff Dionne" <djeffdionne@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, elver@...gle.com,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
 dianders@...omium.org, pmladek@...e.com, arnd@...db.de,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-team@...a.com,
 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 cmpxchg 12/13] sh: Emulate one-byte cmpxchg

On May 2, 2024, at 14:07, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:

> That would be 8-bit xchg() rather than 8-byte cmpxchg(), correct?
> 
> Or am I missing something subtle here that makes sh also support one-byte
> (8-bit) cmpxchg()?

The native SH atomic operation is test and set TAS.B.  J2 adds a compare and swap CAS.L instruction, carefully chosen for patent free prior art (s360, IIRC).

The (relatively expensive) encoding space we allocated for CAS.L does not contain size bits.

Not all SH4 patents had expired when J2 was under development, but now have (watch this space).  Not sure (me myself) if there are more atomic operations in sh4.

Cheers,
J

> 
>                            Thanx, Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ