linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add ti,am62p-cpsw-mac-efuse compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240502100151.GR5338@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 11:01:51 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	srk@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Add ti,am62p-cpsw-mac-efuse
 compatible

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:55:18AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 05/04/2024 07:21, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> > >>>> bindings in the changelog or cover letter.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you for clarifying. I will post the DTS patches corresponding to
> > >>> this patch and reference this patch in the DTS patch series.
> > >>
> > >> I have posted the DTS patch at:
> > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20240404081845.622707-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
> > >> indicating the dependency on this bindings patch.
> > > 
> > > Hello Krzysztof,
> > > 
> > > Do I have to post a v2 for this patch? You had Acked it initially but I
> > 
> > No, I acked it. All this unnecessary talk was because you did not post a
> > user, but it is not a requirement, at least when we expect such user.
> 
> Lee,
> 
> Could you please merge this patch? It applies cleanly on the latest
> linux-next tagged next-20240424.

I ignored it due to the length of discussion that appeared to be
on-going.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]