linux-kernel - Re: mfd: axp20x: convert to use maple tree register cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f1fbc13-af76-4e24-a788-b5c2a52aa519@web.de>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 12:41:04 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, wangkaiyuan@...pur.com,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mfd: axp20x: convert to use maple tree register cache

>>> The maple tree register cache is based on a much more modern data structure
>>> than the rbtree cache and makes optimisation choices which are probably
>>> more appropriate for modern systems than those made by the rbtree cache.
>>
>> Please choose another imperative wording for an improved change description.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc5#n94
>
> This review comment is seldom helpful.

* Does such a feedback indicate a questionable communication conflict?

* Are you still looking for a better wording suggestion?


> You may as well stop using it.

Should patch reviewers and further contributors care more for the compliance
with known development processes?

Regards,
Markus